If you get to cut my program, does that mean I don't have to do your homework anymore?
So, I went to my first SOFD (Social Foundations) class the other day. (For those of you that don't know, this is another class we have to take for the college of ed. that doesn't entirely fit with my subject.) Like every other class, we were given a reading assignment. Ok, no big deal.
So I begin reading. And everything in the paper sounds great. That is, until I got to the part of the paper where, in order to reach the principal's great idea of no more than 15 kids for each teach, they got rid of all "non-essential" type teachers and programs. This included sports, phys. ed. and music.
Oh, but don't worry, they have an english teacher that teaches some music to all of the kids. And at this school in East Harlem band is an after school program.
What?? That's great, make music an afterschool program in a place where the kids cannot necessarly afford instruments!
The school's curriculm had been reduced to Humanities in the mornings, Science and Math in the afternoon. So, if the kid wanted to be something like, an architect, the school would find a way to get them something like an internship. How do they handle a kid wanting to go to college and play the cello? You can't just send them out for that, let them see if they have interest in it and have the pursue it further in college! They have to audition for that!
Also, it actually saves the school money to have some kind of musical group. It can be choir, which requires only music and a teacher. That teacher can have 90 kids at one time! Get a band program in there and the same thing happens.
The principal who designed the school was striving for a school in which everyone felt safe. Safe from the outside and safe to share ideas. A school where the kids all knew each other, knew one teacher very well, and where that one teacher knew the children's parents. A place where the kids learned to work together on solving problems. All of this is already a part of any music program.
Ok, so now we've gotten past my disertation on why music is good in schools, on to what disturbed me the most...
This teacher, by giving us this article to read, just made it ok for 5 classes of new educators to get rid of a music program when they need a little more money in their school! Who knows how many of these people might go on to become administrators of a school some day.
So, I very, very politely bring some of this up to my professor. Instead of badgering him with all of this, I simply inquired as to how the principal delt with kids that were interested in music. He didn't really know, but then let me know I should realize that when the budget gets tight, music teachers are one of the first to get fired, so I should get used to this reality of my chosen profession.
Like I didn't know that. It may be the way things are, but that does not make it right. Isn't that what he just got done trying to impress upon us., just cause schools have always been run the way they are doesn't mean it's the right way. But apparantly that rule only goes so far...